Nate Marquardt vs Ivan Salaverry — UFC Fight Night 1 Result, Stats & Scorecards

Middleweight · 3 rounds · Card

Final

UFC Fight Night 1

Saturday, August 6, 2005 · Las Vegas · Nevada

Nate Marquardt def. Ivan Salaverry

Unanimous Decision · Round 3 · 5:00 · 3 Rnd (5-5-5)

Referee · John McCarthyJon Schorle · 27-30Jeff Mullen · 27-30Glenn Trowbridge · 28-29Source · UFC Stats · round stats archived

Market data not configured

The market provider is not connected in this environment. No prices are estimated in its absence.

Fight progression reconstructed from verified round-level observations.

Unanimous Decision · R3 · 5:00

Nate MarquardtRound 3Ivan Salaverry

8 / 24Sig. strikes7 / 23

33%Accuracy30%

8 / 24Total strikes9 / 25

0Knockdowns0

0 / 0Takedowns0 / 2

2Sub. attempts0

1:24Control0:09

1.6Pace / min1.4

90%Control share10%

Nate Marquardt

Targethead 38% · body 13% · leg 50%

Phasedistance 25% · clinch 38% · ground 38%

Ivan Salaverry

Targethead 14% · body 14% · leg 71%

Phasedistance 86% · clinch 14% · ground 0%

Statistical signals

Control edgeNate Marquardt held 84s of control to 9s.

Descriptive only. These compare recorded output; they are not judge scores and do not say who won the round.

What changed from R2

Pace upNate Marquardt's significant-strike pace moved +100% from R2 to R3, 1.6 against 0.8 per minute.
Accuracy shiftNate Marquardt's significant-strike accuracy moved +13 pts, 33% against 20%.
Target shiftNate Marquardt's head share of landed strikes moved -38 pts, to 38% head with 13% body and 50% leg.
Phase shiftNate Marquardt's ground share of landed strikes moved -13 pts, to 38% on the ground against 25% at distance.
Control swingNate Marquardt's control time moved -92s, 84s against 176s.
Defensive driftNate Marquardt absorbed significant strikes +75% faster than in R2, 1.4 against 0.8 per minute.
Pace upIvan Salaverry's significant-strike pace moved +75% from R2 to R3, 1.4 against 0.8 per minute.
Defensive driftIvan Salaverry absorbed significant strikes +100% faster than in R2, 1.6 against 0.8 per minute.