The market provider is not connected in this environment. No prices are estimated in its absence.
Round-by-Round Analysis
Fight progression reconstructed from verified round-level observations.
Submission · R2 · 2:05
Sam HogerRound 2Jeff Newton
10 / 18Sig. strikes1 / 5
56%Accuracy20%
15 / 23Total strikes2 / 6
0Knockdowns0
1 / 1Takedowns0 / 0
1Sub. attempts1
1:13Control0:00
4.8Pace / min0.5
100%Control share0%
Sam Hoger
Targethead 100% · body 0% · leg 0%
Phasedistance 0% · clinch 0% · ground 100%
Jeff Newton
Targethead 100% · body 0% · leg 0%
Phasedistance 100% · clinch 0% · ground 0%
Statistical signals
Output edgeSam Hoger landed 10 significant strikes to 1.Control edgeSam Hoger held 73s of control to 0s.Striking edgeSam Hoger struck at 56% accuracy to 20%.
Descriptive only. These compare recorded output; they are not judge scores and do not say who won the round.
What changed from R1
Accuracy shiftSam Hoger's significant-strike accuracy moved +56 pts, 56% against 0%.
Control swingSam Hoger's control time moved -139s, 73s against 212s.
Defensive driftSam Hoger absorbed significant strikes +140% faster than in R1, 0.5 against 0.2 per minute.
Pace upJeff Newton's significant-strike pace moved +140% from R1 to R2, 0.5 against 0.2 per minute.
Observed fight vs historical Fight DNA
Compares this fight against each fighter's pre-fight Fight DNA baseline. Shown only where the historical sample supports it.
Sam Hoger
Insufficient sample. This fighter's Fight DNA as of the event date did not have enough covered rounds to compare against, so no deviation is shown.
Jeff Newton
Insufficient sample. This fighter's Fight DNA as of the event date did not have enough covered rounds to compare against, so no deviation is shown.
Fight summary
10Sam Hoger sig. strikes
2Jeff Newton sig. strikes
2rounds observed
+140%largest pace swing, R1 to R2 (Jeff Newton)
R1
R2
Pace is significant strikes landed per minute of observed round time. A round with no recorded observation is left empty rather than drawn as zero.
