The market provider is not connected in this environment. No prices are estimated in its absence.
Round-by-Round Analysis
Fight progression reconstructed from verified round-level observations.
Unanimous Decision · R3 · 5:00
Tecia PenningtonRound 3Michelle Waterson-Gomez
42 / 73Sig. strikes20 / 49
58%Accuracy41%
67 / 101Total strikes22 / 51
0Knockdowns0
1 / 1Takedowns0 / 0
0Sub. attempts0
2:11Control0:04
8.4Pace / min4.0
97%Control share3%
Tecia Pennington
Targethead 81% · body 17% · leg 2%
Phasedistance 62% · clinch 2% · ground 36%
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
Targethead 65% · body 30% · leg 5%
Phasedistance 80% · clinch 15% · ground 5%
Statistical signals
Output edgeTecia Pennington landed 42 significant strikes to 20.Control edgeTecia Pennington held 131s of control to 4s.Striking edgeTecia Pennington struck at 58% accuracy to 41%.
Descriptive only. These compare recorded output; they are not judge scores and do not say who won the round.
What changed from R2
Pace upTecia Pennington's significant-strike pace moved +223% from R2 to R3, 8.4 against 2.6 per minute.
Target shiftTecia Pennington's head share of landed strikes moved +27 pts, to 81% head with 17% body and 2% leg.
Phase shiftTecia Pennington's ground share of landed strikes moved +20 pts, to 36% on the ground against 62% at distance.
Control swingTecia Pennington's control time moved +131s, 131s against 0s.
Defensive driftTecia Pennington absorbed significant strikes +54% faster than in R2, 4.0 against 2.6 per minute.
Pace upMichelle Waterson-Gomez's significant-strike pace moved +54% from R2 to R3, 4.0 against 2.6 per minute.
Target shiftMichelle Waterson-Gomez's head share of landed strikes moved +19 pts, to 65% head with 30% body and 5% leg.
Control swingMichelle Waterson-Gomez's control time moved -229s, 4s against 233s.
Defensive driftMichelle Waterson-Gomez absorbed significant strikes +223% faster than in R2, 8.4 against 2.6 per minute.
Observed fight vs historical Fight DNA
Compares this fight against each fighter's pre-fight Fight DNA baseline. Shown only where the historical sample supports it.
Tecia Pennington
Insufficient sample. This fighter's Fight DNA as of the event date did not have enough covered rounds to compare against, so no deviation is shown.
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
Insufficient sample. This fighter's Fight DNA as of the event date did not have enough covered rounds to compare against, so no deviation is shown.
Fight summary
95Tecia Pennington sig. strikes
56Michelle Waterson-Gomez sig. strikes
3rounds observed
+223%largest pace swing, R2 to R3 (Tecia Pennington)
R1
R2
R3
Pace is significant strikes landed per minute of observed round time. A round with no recorded observation is left empty rather than drawn as zero.
