Distance: 5-inch reach difference
Read matchup Real analysis. Smarter reads. A deeper understanding of the card.
The evidence points to a volume gap (4.7 vs 1.4 strikes per minute); that is the read to test in the first five minutes.
Supporting evidencePace: 4.7 vs 1.4 landed / min
| Attribute | Camur | Cherant |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 24 |
| Height | 6′1″ | 6′1″ |
| Reach | 74″ | 74″ |
| Stance | Orthodox | Southpaw |
| Rank | Unranked | Unranked |
Highlighted rows mark a meaningful factual difference, not an advantage. Unpublished values stay unpublished.
Camur lands 4.7 significant strikes per minute to Cherant’s 1.4: a real volume gap.
Favors CamurRead the first two minutes for who is willing to lead and who is countering; the stored numbers do not flag a lopsided early-round finisher.
The middle rounds belong to whoever sets the pace: Camur averages 4.7 landed per minute to Cherant at 1.4, so Cherant needs the counters to land clean (40% accuracy on record).
Three rounds only: a slow first round is expensive, and round three is often fought by whoever has the gas tank and the lead on the cards.
