Durability: Lemos finished 3× on record
Read matchup Real analysis. Smarter reads. A deeper understanding of the card.
The evidence points to a volume gap (3.7 vs 6.1 strikes per minute) and a finishing gap (40% vs 75% of archived wins); that is the read to test in the first five minutes.
Supporting evidenceExperience: 5 vs 0 five-round fights
| Attribute | Emmett | Vallejos |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 41 | 24 |
| Height | 5′6″ | 5′7″ |
| Reach | 70″ | 68″ |
| Stance | Orthodox | Switch |
| Rank | Unranked | #9 Featherweight |
Highlighted rows mark a meaningful factual difference, not an advantage. Unpublished values stay unpublished.
Emmett has 5 archived five-round fights to Vallejos’ 0; championship rounds are familiar territory for one side.
Favors EmmettVallejos lands 6.1 significant strikes per minute to Emmett’s 3.7: a real volume gap.
Favors VallejosEmmett has been finished 3 times in the archive and absorbs 4.5 strikes per minute; Vallejos has never been stopped in the stored record.
Favors VallejosVallejos has 2 first-round finishes in the last 5 archived results — the opening minutes carry real finishing risk.
The middle rounds belong to whoever sets the pace: Vallejos averages 6.1 landed per minute to Emmett at 3.7, so Emmett needs the counters to land clean (35% accuracy on record).
Scheduled for five rounds: 25 minutes changes the pace math, and a fighter who banks two early rounds can afford to manage the fourth.
