Durability: Caceres finished 6× on record
Read matchup Real analysis. Smarter reads. A deeper understanding of the card.
The evidence points to a volume gap (2.5 vs 4.5 strikes per minute) and a finishing gap (75% vs 29% of archived wins); that is the read to test in the first five minutes.
The stored career numbers do not draw a sharp contrast between these two, which usually means the fight is decided by adjustments rather than a single dominant phase.
Supporting evidencePace: 4.5 vs 2.5 landed / min
| Attribute | Albazi | Kara-France |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 30 |
| Height | 5′5″ | 5′4″ |
| Reach | 68″ | 69″ |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| Rank | #9 Flyweight | Unranked |
Highlighted rows mark a meaningful factual difference, not an advantage. Unpublished values stay unpublished.
Kara-France lands 4.5 significant strikes per minute to Albazi’s 2.5: a real volume gap.
Favors Kara-FranceAlbazi has finished 75% of archived wins (1 KO/TKO, 2 submission), 2 of them inside round one in the last 4.
Favors AlbaziKara-France has been finished 2 times in the archive and absorbs 3.2 strikes per minute; Albazi has never been stopped in the stored record.
Favors AlbaziAlbazi has 2 first-round finishes in the last 4 archived results — the opening minutes carry real finishing risk.
The middle rounds belong to whoever sets the pace: Kara-France averages 4.5 landed per minute to Albazi at 2.5, so Albazi needs the counters to land clean (33% accuracy on record).
Scheduled for five rounds: 25 minutes changes the pace math, and a fighter who banks two early rounds can afford to manage the fourth.
