Danger zone: 4 recent R1 finishes
Read matchup Real analysis. Smarter reads. A deeper understanding of the card.
The evidence points to a volume gap (4.8 vs 0 strikes per minute); that is the read to test in the first five minutes.
Supporting evidencePace: 4.8 vs 0 landed / min
| Attribute | Shamrock | Lober |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 30 |
| Height | 5′10″ | 5′11″ |
| Reach | Not published | Not published |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| Rank | Unranked | Unranked |
Highlighted rows mark a meaningful factual difference, not an advantage. Unpublished values stay unpublished.
Shamrock lands 4.8 significant strikes per minute to Lober’s 0: a real volume gap.
Favors ShamrockShamrock has 3 archived five-round fights to Lober’s 0; championship rounds are familiar territory for one side.
Favors ShamrockShamrock has finished 100% of archived wins (1 KO/TKO, 2 submission), 2 of them inside round one in the last 3.
Favors ShamrockShamrock has 2 first-round finishes in the last 3 archived results — the opening minutes carry real finishing risk.
The middle rounds belong to whoever sets the pace: Shamrock averages 4.8 landed per minute to Lober at 0, so Lober needs the counters to land clean (0% accuracy on record).
Scheduled for five rounds: 25 minutes changes the pace math, and a fighter who banks two early rounds can afford to manage the fourth.
