The market provider is not connected in this environment. No prices are estimated in its absence.
Round-by-Round Analysis
Fight progression reconstructed from verified round-level observations.
Unanimous Decision · R5 · 5:00
Amanda NunesRound 5Julianna Pena
11 / 14Sig. strikes4 / 6
79%Accuracy67%
20 / 26Total strikes14 / 19
0Knockdowns0
2 / 3Takedowns0 / 0
1Sub. attempts0
4:21Control0:00
2.2Pace / min0.8
100%Control share0%
Amanda Nunes
Targethead 91% · body 0% · leg 9%
Phasedistance 9% · clinch 0% · ground 91%
Julianna Pena
Targethead 100% · body 0% · leg 0%
Phasedistance 100% · clinch 0% · ground 0%
Statistical signals
Output edgeAmanda Nunes landed 11 significant strikes to 4.Control edgeAmanda Nunes held 261s of control to 0s.Striking edgeAmanda Nunes struck at 79% accuracy to 67%.
Descriptive only. These compare recorded output; they are not judge scores and do not say who won the round.
What changed from R4
Pace downAmanda Nunes's significant-strike pace moved -31% from R4 to R5, 2.2 against 3.2 per minute.
Phase shiftAmanda Nunes's ground share of landed strikes moved +22 pts, to 91% on the ground against 9% at distance.
Accuracy shiftJulianna Pena's significant-strike accuracy moved +27 pts, 67% against 40%.
Observed fight vs historical Fight DNA
Compares this fight against each fighter's pre-fight Fight DNA baseline. Shown only where the historical sample supports it.
Amanda Nunes
Insufficient sample. This fighter's Fight DNA as of the event date did not have enough covered rounds to compare against, so no deviation is shown.
Julianna Pena
Insufficient sample. This fighter's Fight DNA as of the event date did not have enough covered rounds to compare against, so no deviation is shown.
Fight summary
85Amanda Nunes sig. strikes
60Julianna Pena sig. strikes
5rounds observed
-76%largest pace swing, R2 to R3 (Julianna Pena)
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
Pace is significant strikes landed per minute of observed round time. A round with no recorded observation is left empty rather than drawn as zero.
