- Home
- News
- Around MMA
- Arnold Allen’s UFC 333 withdrawal erases the matchup that made Aaron Pico’s wrestling matter
Arnold Allen’s UFC 333 withdrawal erases the matchup that made Aaron Pico’s wrestling matter
Pico may remain on the Abu Dhabi card, but a replacement would reset every meaningful betting variable built into the Allen matchup.

Arnold Allen is out of his scheduled three-round featherweight fight with Aaron Pico at UFC 333 on Oct. 24 in Abu Dhabi. MMA Mania reported that Allen has been rehabbing after previous treatments, cannot be ready in time and does not yet have an officially announced replacement, although the UFC is seeking to keep Pico on the card.
The immediate consequence is the loss of a ranked matchup between No. 7 Allen and No. 12 Pico. The betting consequence runs deeper: this was a fight defined by Pico’s attempt to force a high-output wrestling pace against the most experienced and defensively reliable opponent of his brief UFC run. If Pico receives a replacement, none of the Allen-specific conclusions should transfer automatically.
Allen’s defence was the central test for Pico
Pico’s UFC statistics are aggressive but narrow. Across two bouts and four completed rounds, he has landed 113 significant strikes and eight takedowns. His rates stand at 6.16 significant strikes and 6.54 takedowns per 15 minutes, with 53 percent striking accuracy and 50 percent takedown accuracy.
- Date
- Sat, Oct 24, 2026
- Where
- Etihad Arena · Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Weight class
- Featherweight
- Position
- Main · 3 rounds
- Status
- Announced
That profile gave the Allen fight a clear mechanism. Pico could pressure through volume, chain wrestling entries behind his hands and try to accumulate control. Allen, however, owns 73 percent career takedown defence over a much larger UFC sample. He has completed 46 rounds across 15 archived bouts, allowing his defensive record to carry considerably more weight than any conclusion drawn from Pico’s two UFC appearances.
Allen also presented more than a takedown-stuffing test. He lands 3.52 significant strikes per minute while absorbing 3.15, with 60 percent striking defence. Pico lands 2.64 more significant strikes per minute, but he absorbs 3.11 and has defended 45 percent of opponents’ significant strikes. The volume gap favoured Pico; the defensive stability and depth of evidence belonged to Allen.
That tension touched several markets. Pico’s takedown totals depended on whether repeat entries could break Allen’s first layer of defence. Significant-strike totals depended on where the fight settled: open exchanges would favour Pico’s pace, while prolonged wrestling sequences could suppress both fighters’ striking counts. Method-of-victory and distance positions had to account for Allen’s durability as well as Pico’s limited UFC history.
More from the desk
Amanda Nunes’ scouting claim adds intrigue, not proof, against Kayla Harrison
Nunes says old sparring sessions exposed persistent flaws, but the UFC 334 matchup will turn on whether her proven takedown defence survives a 1,229-day layoff.

Lone’er Kavanagh’s variety meets Ramazan Temirov’s concentrated power at UFC 333
Temirov’s five knockdowns create the obvious danger, but Kavanagh’s reach, target diversity and deeper grappling record complicate every finish-based betting angle.
